📜 New here? ✦ The Historical Kitchen ✦ Feast Menus & Dayboards ✦ Harl. MS 279 ✦ Steward’s Table
Charlet a-forcyd ryally: Royal Enriched Pork Charlet from Harleian MS 279
![]() |
| Charlet a-forcyd ryally reconstructed from Harleian MS 279. Original 2017 kitchen photograph. |
This is the second of two charlet recipes that appear one after the other in Harleian MS 279, and it is much more elaborate than the first. The simpler Charlette cooks pork or veal in milk with eggs, saffron, and ale, lets the mixture curdle, presses it lightly, and serves it with broth. Charlet a-forcyd ryally takes that basic idea and dresses it for company.
Here the cook uses almond milk instead of cow’s milk, grinds the pork fine, mixes it with strained eggs, adds wine, saffron, ginger, galingale, and sugar, presses the curd twice, slices it, and serves it beneath a saffron-colored almond-milk-and-broth sauce finished with mace and still more sugar.
I first reconstructed this dish in January 2017. It worked mechanically: the almond milk and wine produced a fine-grained curd that could be pressed and sliced. It was also, by a comfortable margin, one of the least popular dishes with my taste testers.
Returning to the manuscript now gives me reason to reconsider that verdict. The old reconstruction got the essential idea right—curd, drain, press, slice, sauce—but it moved the ginger, galingale, and sugar into the egg mixture instead of seasoning the curd after the first pressing; it pressed the curd only once; and its sauce omitted both the fresh broth and the sugar specified by the manuscript. In other words, the dish we disliked in 2017 was not quite the dish the manuscript describes.
Why You Will Love This Recipe
- It preserves a genuinely unusual medieval technique: meat and egg transformed into a sliceable pressed curd.
- The manuscript gives us a clear comparison between an ordinary Charlette and an explicitly “royal” enriched version.
- The dish combines savory pork with saffron, wine, ginger, galingale, mace, sugar, almond milk, and broth.
- The double pressing is explicit and is easy to miss in a quick reading.
- It offers a perfect example of why historical reconstruction should remain revisable when a closer source reading changes the method.
